Seriously, aren't they? In fact Arminianism seems a little less dangerous to me.
"Semipelagian thought says a distinction is made between the beginning of faith and the increase of faith; while the latter is the work of God, the beginning of faith is an act of free will."
This is what I encounter in every Church I've ever visited or spoke to someone about outside reformed circles. Isn't that even worse than classical Arminianism?
"Semipelagian thought says a distinction is made between the beginning of faith and the increase of faith; while the latter is the work of God, the beginning of faith is an act of free will."
This is what I encounter in every Church I've ever visited or spoke to someone about outside reformed circles. Isn't that even worse than classical Arminianism?